|
November
24, 2003 -- While
this question has not been around since dinosaurs ruled the
earth, it sometimes seems like it. What are subsequent
events? What are the criteria as to the proper treatment?
The
key is the nature of the event. Obviously, it must be
something discovered after the end of the fiscal year.
Otherwise, there would be nothing “subsequent” about the
event. If it is the discovery of a condition that existed
before year’s end, an adjustment to the basic financial
statements is a real possibility. Examples are contingencies
that are likely to result in the company or organization
making cash payments to other parties, e.g., patent
infringements or torts that are not fully insured.
Management’s estimate of the damages is permitted. All of
the facts need not be ascertainable, but the probable
minimum loss must be recorded as a liability.
But
what if the underlying event did not occur until after
year’s end? In that case, disclosure in the notes to
financial statements is required.
What
transactions or events fall into this category? Following is
a list of the more common items:
-
New
debt
-
Refinanced
debt
-
Treasury
stock purchased
-
Major
commitments to purchase inventory, fixed assets or to
lease assets
-
Purchase
of a business or new product line
-
Loss
on receivables due to a condition arising after the
balance sheet date
-
(However,
a customer’s bankruptcy filing after the balance sheet
date is likely the result of a condition existing
before.)
Occasionally,
an event may be so significant that the best way to convey
the effect to the users of the financial statements is to
provide, as a supplement to the historical financial
statements, pro forma statements showing the effects as if
the event occurred before year’s end.
For
more information, please contact
Mike Byrnes or via phone at 215-940-7801.
Back to News Archive
|